Landmark v. Rodriquez — writ application dismissed after relators withdrew it

Case
Corey Landmark v. Nurse Michelle Rodriquez, LPN; Dr. Toce; and State of Louisiana through Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Dixon Correctional Center
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
MILLER (appointment info not available); EDWARDS (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
July 22, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 0216
Topics
Supervisory writs, Voluntary withdrawal, Corrections
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Corey Landmark brought an action against Nurse Michelle Rodriquez, LPN, Dr. Paul Toce, and the State of Louisiana through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Dixon Correctional Center. The matter was pending in the 20th Judicial District Court for East Feliciana Parish under docket number 46939.

The State, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, and Dr. Toce applied to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for supervisory writs. Their counsel later advised the appellate court that the case had concluded and requested withdrawal of the writ application.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit dismissed the supervisory writ application in response to relators’ counsel’s request that it be withdrawn.

The court did not address the merits of the underlying action or decide any substantive legal issue. Its disposition rested solely on counsel’s representation that the case was concluded and the relators no longer wished to pursue writ review.

Key Takeaways

  • The supervisory writ application was dismissed at the relators’ request.
  • Counsel represented that the underlying case had concluded.
  • The court issued no ruling on the merits of the parties’ claims or defenses.

Why It Matters

The disposition illustrates that a Louisiana appellate court may dismiss a supervisory writ application when the applicants withdraw it after the underlying case concludes. Because the court did not reach the merits, the ruling establishes no substantive precedent concerning the underlying claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top