In re Chatterjee — Ohio Supreme Court imposed an interim suspension after a felony conviction

Case
In re Chatterjee
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Judge
Kennedy, C.J.; Fischer, J.; DeWine, J.; Brunner, J.; Deters, J.; Hawkins, J.; Shanahan, J.
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
2026-1315
Topics
Attorney Discipline, Felony Conviction, Interim Suspension
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

On September 28, 2026, the director of the Board of Professional Conduct filed a certified copy of a judgment entry showing that Ohio attorney Trisha Lila Chatterjee had been convicted of a felony. The opinion does not identify the offense or describe the underlying conduct.

The filing was made under Gov.Bar R. V(18), which governs interim suspensions following felony convictions. Chatterjee was licensed in Ohio under Attorney Registration No. 0103358 and had a last known business address in Springdale, Ohio.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court of Ohio ordered Chatterjee suspended from practicing law on an interim basis, effective immediately. It also referred the matter to disciplinary counsel for investigation and the commencement of disciplinary proceedings.

The court ordered Chatterjee to stop providing legal services, appearing for others, handling client trust funds or property, and exercising the privileges of an Ohio lawyer. It also imposed continuing-education, client-notification, file-return, fee-refund, recordkeeping, and compliance-affidavit requirements, and directed that she not be reinstated unless she satisfies the governing rules and the court affirmatively orders reinstatement.

Key Takeaways

  • A certified felony-conviction entry triggered Chatterjee’s immediate interim suspension under Gov.Bar R. V(18).
  • The order is interim rather than a final disciplinary sanction; disciplinary counsel must investigate and commence further proceedings.
  • Chatterjee must protect current clients’ interests, account for client funds and property, complete required continuing legal education, and satisfy all reinstatement conditions before returning to practice.

Why It Matters

The order illustrates Ohio’s procedure for promptly removing a lawyer from practice after proof of a felony conviction while reserving final discipline for later proceedings. It also underscores that an interim suspension carries immediate operational duties designed to protect clients, courts, and the public.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top