In re Vogt — Ohio Supreme Court immediately suspended attorney after felony conviction

Case
In re Vogt
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Judge
Kennedy, C.J.; Fischer, J.; DeWine, J.; Brunner, J.; Deters, J.; Hawkins, J.; Shanahan, J.
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
2026-1175
Topics
Attorney Discipline; Interim Suspension; Felony Conviction
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

On September 2, 2026, the director of Ohio’s Board of Professional Conduct filed a certified copy of a judgment entry showing that attorney Gregory John Vogt had been convicted of a felony. Vogt was licensed to practice law in Ohio and had a last known business address in West Chester.

The filing was made under Gov.Bar R. V(18), which governs disciplinary action following an attorney’s felony conviction. The order does not identify the offense or describe the underlying criminal conduct.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court of Ohio ordered Vogt suspended from practicing law on an interim basis, effective immediately. It also referred the matter to disciplinary counsel for investigation and commencement of disciplinary proceedings.

During the suspension, Vogt may not represent, advise, or prepare legal instruments for others or otherwise provide legal services. The court also imposed client-notification, file-return, fee-refund, trust-property accounting, continuing-education, and reporting requirements, and provided that Vogt may not resume practicing until he satisfies the governing reinstatement requirements and the court orders his reinstatement.

Key Takeaways

  • A certified felony-conviction entry triggered Vogt’s immediate interim suspension under Gov.Bar R. V(18)(A)(4).
  • The suspension bars Vogt from practicing law in any form while disciplinary counsel investigates and begins disciplinary proceedings.
  • Vogt must protect existing clients’ interests, document his compliance, satisfy applicable continuing-education requirements, and obtain a court order before reinstatement.

Why It Matters

The order illustrates Ohio’s immediate protective response when a licensed attorney is convicted of a felony. The interim suspension removes the attorney from practice while the disciplinary process determines what further sanction may be warranted.

It also underscores that suspension entails affirmative duties to clients, courts, opposing parties, disciplinary authorities, and the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection—not merely a prohibition on appearing in court.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top