State v. Taylor — Ohio Supreme Court vacated and remanded for application of State v. King

Case
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Taylor, Appellee
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Judge
Kennedy, C.J.; DeWine, J.; Fischer, J.; Brunner, J.; Deters, J.; Hawkins, J.; Shanahan, J.
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
2025-0439
Topics
Criminal Law; Appellate Procedure; Remand
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The State of Ohio appealed from a judgment of the First District Court of Appeals in Hamilton County involving appellee Damico Taylor.

While the appeal was pending, the Supreme Court of Ohio decided State v. King, 2026-Ohio-2656. The court submitted Taylor on August 5, 2026, and resolved it through a brief judgment entry.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court of Ohio vacated the First District Court of Appeals’ judgment and remanded the case to that court for application of State v. King.

Justices DeWine, Brunner, Deters, Hawkins, and Shanahan joined the judgment. Chief Justice Kennedy and Justice Fischer dissented in accordance with Chief Justice Kennedy’s separate opinion in King.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District’s judgment was vacated.
  • The case returns to the First District for application of State v. King.
  • The Supreme Court did not provide additional factual analysis or independently apply King to Taylor’s case.

Why It Matters

The disposition directs the intermediate appellate court to reconsider the case under the rule announced in King. Because the opinion contains only the remand order, the First District must determine how King affects Taylor’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top