Coverage since January 23, 2026

Section 230

Uncategorized

The Upper Deck Co. v. Pixels.com — S.D. Cal. Holds Print-on-Demand Vendor Loses Section 230 Immunity for the Physical Sale of Infringing Prints, but Keeps It for Online Display and Search Tools

Chief Judge Bashant’s amended summary-judgment order in The Upper Deck Co. v. Pixels.com draws a clean line through Section 230 for print-on-demand platforms: when Pixels acts as a website operator displaying and indexing user-uploaded images, Section 230 immunizes it; when Pixels acts as the

Uncategorized

McCarthy v. Amazon — Ninth Circuit Revives Sodium-Nitrite Suicide Suit Against Amazon; Section 230 Continues to Bar the Removed-Reviews Theory

An unpublished Ninth Circuit memorandum reverses the dismissal of product-liability, negligence, and NIED claims brought after two teenagers ingested sodium nitrite purchased from Amazon — but leaves intact the district court’s holding that Section 230 bars the part of the case premised on Ama

Uncategorized

State v. Rauch Sharak — Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Google Was a Private Actor, Not a Government Agent, When It Scanned a User’s Account for CSAM

The Wisconsin Supreme Court joined a near-unanimous national consensus that an electronic service provider that scans user accounts for child sexual abuse material and reports its findings does so as a private actor, not a government agent — and that neither Section 230 nor 18 U.S.C. § 2258A convert

Uncategorized

Stokinger v. Armslist — First Circuit Holds Years of In-State Firearm Listings, Combined With Site Design and Ad Revenue, Show Purposeful Availment

Reviving claims against the online firearms marketplace Armslist, the First Circuit held that 16,000 New Hampshire firearm listings per year — viewed together with the site’s geographic-listing design and the advertising revenue those listings generated — were enough to make a prima facie case

Uncategorized

State ex rel. Bird v. TikTok — Iowa Supreme Court Holds TikTok’s Data Collection, Targeted Advertising, and Contractual Relationships Establish Specific Jurisdiction in Consumer-Fraud Suit Over App-Store Age Ratings

Iowa’s Attorney General sued TikTok over what she alleges are deceptive ’12+’ age ratings in the Apple App Store. A unanimous Iowa Supreme Court held that TikTok’s contractual relationships with hundreds of thousands of Iowa users, plus its targeted advertising and Iowa-speci

Scroll to Top