Bekanich v. Bekanich — Appeal dismissed on appellant’s unopposed motion

Case
Stephen Bekanich v. Amy Bekanich
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Date Decided
June 30, 2026
Docket No.
03-26-00140-CV (Trial Court: D-1-FM-24-000818)
Topics
Appellate procedure, Motion to dismiss
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Stephen Bekanich appealed from an order of the 353rd District Court of Travis County, which was presided over by Judge Laurie Eiserloh. The appeal was docketed in the Third Court of Appeals as No. 03-26-00140-CV.

The Court’s Holding

The court granted appellant Stephen Bekanich’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a). The appeal was dismissed accordingly.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may seek dismissal of an appeal by unopposed motion.
  • Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) provides the procedural mechanism for such dismissals.
  • The court will grant unopposed motions to dismiss an appeal.

Why It Matters

This dismissal order illustrates the appellate practice rule permitting appellants to voluntarily discontinue appeals through unopposed motions. Once an appeal is docketed, an appellant retains the procedural option to withdraw it without proceeding to decision on the merits, provided the opposing party does not object.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top