Delaney v. Neely — Appeal voluntarily dismissed; expedited mandate denied

Case
Andrew Delaney v. Jerry W. Neely
Court
Texas First Court of Appeals
Judge
Adams (Greg Abbott, 2020); Rivas-Molloy (elected 2020)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
01-26-00503-CV
Topics
Voluntary Dismissal, Appellate Mandate, Good Cause
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Andrew Delaney, proceeding without counsel, appealed from a case in the 157th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The underlying trial court case was numbered 2025-94420.

Before the appellate court issued an opinion, Delaney filed an unopposed motion voluntarily seeking dismissal of the appeal. He also asked the court to expedite issuance of its mandate, but his motion provided no reason for doing so.

The Court’s Holding

The Texas First Court of Appeals granted Delaney’s motion in part and dismissed the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).

The court denied his request to expedite the mandate because he had not shown good cause as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 18.1(c). It dismissed all other pending motions as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may obtain voluntary dismissal of an appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • A request to expedite the appellate mandate must establish good cause.
  • Dismissal of the appeal rendered the remaining pending motions moot.

Why It Matters

The memorandum opinion illustrates that an unopposed voluntary-dismissal request does not automatically justify accelerated issuance of the mandate. A party seeking expedition must provide a reason demonstrating good cause.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top