Ecommerce Lending — Third Court dismisses settled lawsuit and appeal with prejudice

Case
Ecommerce Lending, LLC v. American Property Investment, Inc
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Judge
Darlene Byrne (elected 2020)
Date Decided
July 24, 2026
Docket No.
03-26-00556-CV
Topics
Settlement; Voluntary Dismissal; Interlocutory Appeal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ecommerce Lending, LLC brought an interlocutory appeal against American Property Investment, Inc. from a proceeding in the 368th District Court of Williamson County.

After the parties settled the matter, Ecommerce Lending filed an unopposed motion asking the Third Court of Appeals to dismiss its appeal with prejudice.

The Court’s Holding

The court granted Ecommerce Lending’s motion under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a).

The court dismissed both the underlying lawsuit and the appeal with prejudice. It did not address the merits of the parties’ dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • A settlement resolved the dispute while the interlocutory appeal was pending.
  • The appellant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice was unopposed.
  • The court dismissed both the lawsuit and the appeal with prejudice under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a).

Why It Matters

The disposition confirms that an agreed settlement may end not only a pending interlocutory appeal but also the underlying lawsuit when the appellant requests that relief and the court grants it. Because the court issued no merits ruling, the opinion establishes no substantive holding about the parties’ underlying claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top