Garza v. Danshaw — Voluntarily dismissed the appeal at Garza’s request

Case
Julia Garza v. Craig B. Danshaw, D.O.
Court
Texas Sixth Court of Appeals
Judge
Scott E. Stevens (elected 2018); van Cleef (Greg Abbott, 2022); Rambin
Date Decided
September 9, 2026
Docket No.
06-26-00063-CV
Topics
Voluntary Dismissal; Appellate Procedure; Docket Equalization
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Julia Garza appealed a case involving appellee Craig B. Danshaw, D.O., from the 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. The appeal was originally filed in the Second Court of Appeals.

The Texas Supreme Court transferred the case to the Sixth Court of Appeals as part of its docket-equalization efforts. Garza later moved to voluntarily dismiss the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth Court of Appeals granted Garza’s motion under Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which permits an appellate court to dismiss an appeal on the appellant’s motion.

Accordingly, the court dismissed the appeal. The memorandum opinion did not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may seek voluntary dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • The court granted Garza’s motion and dismissed the appeal without reaching the merits.
  • The Texas Supreme Court had transferred the appeal from the Second Court of Appeals for docket equalization.

Why It Matters

The opinion illustrates the straightforward procedure for ending a Texas civil appeal at the appellant’s request. Because the court dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds, it established no ruling on the parties’ underlying claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top