Harris Central Appraisal District v. Enterprise GC — Appeal dismissed after parties reached an agreement

Case
Harris Central Apprasisal District F/K/A Harris County Appraisal District v. Enterprise GC LLC
Court
Texas First Court of Appeals
Judge
Adams (Greg Abbott, 2020); Guerra (elected 2020)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
01-24-00504-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Voluntary Dismissal; Settlement; Costs
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Harris Central Appraisal District, formerly known as Harris County Appraisal District, appealed an April 22, 2024 final judgment that the 151st District Court of Harris County rendered in favor of Enterprise GC LLC.

On July 6, 2026, HCAD filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, explaining that it no longer wished to pursue the case because the parties had reached an agreement in the underlying lawsuit. Enterprise did not oppose the requested dismissal, and no other party had filed a notice of appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First Court of Appeals granted HCAD’s motion and dismissed the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). The court did not address the merits of the trial court’s judgment.

Consistent with the parties’ agreement, the court taxed costs and fees against the party that incurred them. It also dismissed all other pending motions as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may obtain voluntary dismissal of its appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • The appeal ended without an appellate ruling on the merits because the parties reached an agreement in the underlying lawsuit.
  • Each party remained responsible for the costs and fees it incurred, and all other pending motions became moot.

Why It Matters

The decision illustrates the procedural effect of resolving a dispute while an appeal is pending: the appellate court may dismiss the appeal at the appellant’s request without reviewing the underlying judgment. Parties should also expressly address appellate costs and fees in their agreement, as the court may allocate them according to that agreement.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top