Background
E 100 Investment, LLC sought a writ of mandamus challenging a trial court order that granted a temporary injunction.
The underlying action is Pamela Gentry Banks, DBA Regal Paradise Banquet Hall v. E 100 Investment, LLC, cause number 2026-08477, pending before Judge Dawn Rogers in the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas.
The Court’s Holding
The Texas First Court of Appeals denied E 100 Investment’s petition for mandamus relief under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a) and 52.8(a).
The court did not discuss the temporary injunction’s terms or provide further reasoning in its memorandum opinion. It also dismissed all pending motions as moot.
Key Takeaways
- The court left the challenged temporary-injunction order undisturbed by denying mandamus relief.
- The memorandum opinion cites Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a) and 52.8(a) as the basis for denial.
- Any pending motions in the original proceeding were dismissed as moot.
Why It Matters
The decision ends this mandamus proceeding without granting E 100 Investment extraordinary relief from the temporary injunction. Because the court supplied no substantive analysis of the injunction or the governing mandamus standards, the opinion offers limited guidance beyond its disposition of this particular petition.