In re Harris — Mandamus petition denied

Case
In re Willie Otis Harris
Court
Texas Tenth Court of Appeals
Judge
Chief Justice Johnson (appointment info not available); Justice Smith (appointment info not available); Justice Harris (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
10-26-00314-CR
Topics
Mandamus, Criminal Law, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Willie Otis Harris filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Texas Tenth Court of Appeals. The matter came before the court as an original proceeding under docket number 10-26-00314-CR.

The memorandum opinion does not identify the order or conduct Harris challenged, the relief he requested, or the arguments supporting his petition.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Harris’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

The memorandum opinion provides no legal analysis or stated reason for the denial. Justice Smith delivered the opinion for a panel consisting of Chief Justice Johnson and Justices Smith and Harris.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the mandamus petition.
  • The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or requested relief.
  • The court supplied no reasoning or legal standard for its disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this original mandamus proceeding without granting Harris relief. Because the unpublished memorandum opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it offers little guidance beyond the disposition of this particular petition.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top