Background
Appellants Mario and Norma Linan sought to appeal two orders from the trial court: one from May 2021 granting the City of San Benito’s plea to jurisdiction on their negligence claim, and another from February 11, 2026, granting the City’s plea to jurisdiction on their constitutional takings claim. The appellants filed their notices of appeal on May 1, 2026. Upon review, the court found jurisdictional issues with the timeliness of the appeals and initially dismissed them on June 18, 2026. After the appellants filed a motion for rehearing, the court withdrew its initial opinion and reconsidered the matter.
The core procedural question was whether the appellants’ notices of appeal were timely filed. Under Texas law, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of judgment, or within ninety days if a timely motion for new trial is filed beforehand.
The Court’s Holding
The court dismissed both appeals for lack of jurisdiction because the notices of appeal were not timely filed. The final judgment was signed on February 11, 2026. The deadline to file a motion for new trial was thirty days after that date—March 13, 2026. However, the appellants did not file their motion for new trial until March 18, 2026, five days late.
Because the motion for new trial was untimely, it did not extend the ninety-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal. Therefore, the appellants’ notice of appeal was due by March 13, 2026. The appellants did not file their notice of appeal until May 1, 2026—nearly two months late. The court clerk notified them of the defect on May 6, 2026, giving them ten days to correct it, but they failed to do so. The court held that when a notice of appeal is not timely filed, appellate jurisdiction is lost and the appeal must be dismissed.
Key Takeaways
- An untimely motion for new trial does not extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal, even if it would normally trigger a ninety-day deadline.
- Appellate jurisdiction is strictly limited to timely-perfected appeals; missing the deadline results in loss of jurisdiction.
- A single missed deadline—here, filing the motion for new trial five days late—can be fatal to an entire appeal.
- Appellants who receive notice from the appellate clerk of jurisdictional defects must respond promptly; failing to correct them results in dismissal.
Why It Matters
This decision underscores the inflexible nature of appellate procedural deadlines in Texas. Missing the motion for new trial deadline by just five days cost the appellants their right to appeal entirely—regardless of the merits of their underlying claims regarding negligence and constitutional takings. Practitioners must carefully track and timely file all motions and notices in sequence, as each deadline is jurisdictional and cannot be extended by excusable neglect or agreement of the parties.
For trial practitioners, this serves as a stark reminder that appellate rights can be lost through procedural missteps at the trial court level. Filing a motion for new trial on time is critical to preserving the extended ninety-day deadline for the notice of appeal, and waiting even a few days can prove catastrophic.
✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.