Navien, Inc. v. Curly’s Plumbing & Big Blade Sewer Service — Appeal dismissed due to settlement

Case
Navien, Inc. v. Curly’s Plumbing & Big Blade Sewer Service, Inc.
Court
Texas 10th Court of Appeals (Tenth Appellate District)
Date Decided
June 18, 2026
Docket No.
10-25-00166-CV
Topics
Settlement, Appellate Procedure, Motion Practice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Navien, Inc. filed a petition for a permissive appeal from summary judgment rulings rendered by the 18th District Court of Johnson County against Curly’s Plumbing & Big Blade Sewer Service, Inc. The appeal was docketed in the Texas 10th Court of Appeals. Before the appellate court could rule on whether to grant permission for the appeal to proceed, Navien filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, indicating that the parties had reached a settlement agreement and sought to terminate the litigation.

The Court’s Holding

The Texas 10th Court of Appeals granted Navien’s motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a). The dismissal with prejudice is final and precludes either party from refiling the same claims in the future. The court ordered that each party bear its own costs of appeal, a cost allocation consistent with the settlement agreement reached between the parties.

Key Takeaways

  • Litigation can be resolved through settlement at any stage of the appellate process, even before briefing or argument.
  • A dismissal with prejudice provides finality and prevents refiling of the same claims.
  • Settlement agreements typically include provisions addressing cost allocation, as reflected in the court’s order that each party pay its own appellate costs.

Why It Matters

While primarily procedural, this decision illustrates an important principle in Texas litigation: settlement can effectively conclude disputes at any appellate stage, providing both parties with finality. For practitioners, the case underscores the value of pursuing settlement negotiations even after adverse summary judgment rulings and the importance of promptly moving to dismiss appeals once settlement is reached. The decision also reflects the appellate system’s deference to parties’ settlement decisions and the efficiency gains achieved when parties resolve disputes without requiring judicial resolution on the merits.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top