Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since October 31, 2025
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Third Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Uncategorized

Johnson & Johnson v. Samsung Bioepis — Third Circuit Holds Market-Share Loss from Biosimilar Competition Is Not Per Se Irreparable Harm

The Third Circuit affirmed denial of J&J’s preliminary injunction against Samsung’s sublicensing of a Stelara biosimilar to a Cigna subsidiary, holding that loss of market share in the biologics market does not categorically constitute irreparable harm in breach-of-contract cases.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Uncategorized

ASTM v. UpCodes — Third Circuit Holds That Republishing Copyrighted Building Codes Incorporated into Law Is Fair Use

The Third Circuit affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that UpCodes’ verbatim republication of copyrighted ASTM building standards incorporated into law likely constitutes fair use because its purpose — providing free public access to the law — is transformative.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Uncategorized

ASTM International v. UpCodes — Third Circuit Holds That Online Publication of Copyrighted Building Standards Incorporated Into Law Is Likely Fair Use

The Third Circuit affirmed the denial of ASTM’s preliminary injunction, holding that UpCodes’ free online publication of copyrighted technical standards that have been incorporated by reference into building codes likely constitutes fair use — even though UpCodes is a for-profit company

Uncategorized

ASTM International v. UpCodes — Third Circuit Holds That Online Publication of Copyrighted Building Standards Incorporated Into Law Is Likely Fair Use

The Third Circuit affirmed the denial of ASTM’s preliminary injunction, holding that UpCodes’ free online publication of copyrighted technical standards that have been incorporated by reference into building codes likely constitutes fair use — even though UpCodes is a for-profit company

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Uncategorized

Penn State v. Vintage Brand — M.D. Pa. Upholds $28K Trademark Verdict, Treats Initial Interest Confusion as a Lens, Not a Standalone Claim

A Pennsylvania federal court upheld a $28,000 jury verdict for Penn State in its long-running trademark suit against vintage-merch retailer Vintage Brand, treating initial interest confusion not as a standalone doctrine but as one way to satisfy the standard multi-factor confusion analysis.

Scroll to Top