Johnson v Salvation Army — Tribunal upholds rating exemption for hall and prayer room

Case
Nicola Johnson (Valuation Officer) v The Salvation Army Trustee Company
Court
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (United Kingdom)
Judge
Elizabeth Cooke (HM Queen Elizabeth II, on the advice of Lord Chancellor David Gauke MP and Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder, 2019)
Date Decided
1 October 2026
Citation
[2026] UKUT 370 (LC)
Topics
Business rates, religious exemption, office use, ancillary use

Background

The Salvation Army occupied 101 Newington Causeway, London as its headquarters in 2017, with offices for up to 500 staff. It was accepted that most of the building qualified for exemption from non-domestic rating under paragraph 11(2)(b) of Schedule 5 to the Local Government Finance Act 1988.

The dispute concerned a large hall and a small prayer room. The hall was used extensively for staff meetings, training, presentations and other workplace events, but also for weekly prayer meetings and Christmas carol services. The prayer room was available to staff for private prayer or reflection. The Valuation Tribunal for England held both spaces exempt; the Valuation Officer appealed.

The Court’s Holding

The Upper Tribunal dismissed the appeal. It held that “ancillary” use under paragraph 11(2)(b) means use subordinate, supplemental or incidental to office use, but need not be a generic or typical office facility. The provision is to be construed in the ordinary way, not with a specially liberal approach for religious bodies.

On the facts, the hall was primarily used for activities ancillary to office use, and its additional use for prayer meetings and carol services did not alter that conclusion. The prayer room was provided for staff wellbeing and used by staff; it was no less ancillary to office use than facilities such as a kitchen. Private prayer does not itself prevent a room from qualifying for the exemption where its use is ancillary to office use.

Key Takeaways

  • Ancillary office use is not limited to facilities commonly found in every office.
  • A room’s religious use does not automatically defeat exemption under paragraph 11(2)(b).
  • The hall and prayer room were exempt, leaving the property’s agreed rateable value at £1.

Why It Matters

The decision clarifies that rating exemption for religious organisations’ office premises turns on the factual relationship between a space’s use and office use, rather than on whether the facility is religiously neutral or typical of a conventional office.

It also confirms that space used for private prayer may fall within the office-use exemption where it serves staff and is ancillary to the organisation’s office occupation.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top