Rapkin v. Johnson Financial Group — estate representative must repay excessive nonlegal fees

Case
In re the Estate of Nancy H. Balcer: Stephanie Rapkin v. Johnson Financial Group
Court
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
Judge
Donald, C.J.; Colón, P.J.; Geenen, J.
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
2024AP1328
Topics
Probate; Personal representatives; Attorney fees; Trusts
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nancy H. Balcer’s will named attorney Stephanie Rapkin as personal representative of her estate and Johnson Financial Group (JFG) as successor representative. JFG was trustee of Balcer’s revocable trust. After Balcer died, Rapkin prepared probate materials, cleaned out Balcer’s condominium, and arranged for personal property to be donated, sold, or distributed.

Before domiciliary letters formally appointed her in February 2021, Rapkin billed JFG $24,225 for 64.6 hours of work at her $375 hourly attorney rate. Only 4.9 hours were legal work; the rest was nonlegal work. After Rapkin did not timely close the estate, the circuit court removed her, appointed JFG, and ordered her to repay $18,716.25 while allowing her to retain attorney-rate compensation for legal work and $75 per hour for nonlegal work.

The Court’s Holding

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed. It first held that the May 8, 2024 order was final and appealable because it resolved all remaining issues involving Rapkin, required repayment within 30 days, and denied JFG’s requests for additional recovery and attorney fees. A later judgment order did not make the earlier order nonfinal.

On the merits, the court held that Wisconsin’s relation-back statute made Rapkin’s powers as personal representative apply to her preappointment acts that benefited the estate. Her authority to possess and dispose of estate property came from the will and her role as personal representative, not from an implied independent-contractor agreement with JFG as trustee. Accordingly, Wis. Stat. § 857.05 governed her compensation, and she could not charge her attorney rate for nonprofessional services.

Key Takeaways

  • A personal representative’s authority can relate back to beneficial estate work performed before formal appointment.
  • Receiving payment from a trust trustee does not itself establish an independent-contractor relationship.
  • A personal representative may not bill attorney-level rates for nonlegal estate-administration tasks under Wis. Stat. § 857.05.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that the substance and source of authority for estate work—not the timing of formal appointment or the source of payment—determine whether statutory limits on personal-representative compensation apply. Attorneys handling early post-death administration should separately identify legal services and nonlegal tasks when billing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top