U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California

Uncategorized

Blose v. Commissioner of Social Security — E.D. Cal. Affirms Disability Denial Despite ALJ’s Inaccurate Statement About Treatment Records

Eastern District of California affirms a disability denial where the administrative law judge erred by stating that the claimant never reported her need to lie down — the records did show such reports — but the error was harmless because the ALJ provided independent, valid reasons to discount the te

Uncategorized

Poe v. Conrad — E.D. Cal. Allows Sexual Assault Victim to Proceed Pseudonymously and Sustains Most Battery and Tort Claims

Eastern District of California allows the plaintiff in a civil sexual assault case against a Sacramento commercial real estate developer to proceed under a pseudonym, dismisses her assault claim with leave to amend, and sustains battery, sexual battery, IIED, and most other claims based on allegatio

Uncategorized

Solis v. Commissioner of Social Security — E.D. Cal. Recommends Remand Where Vocational Expert Failed to Resolve Reasoning Level Conflict with DOT

Eastern District of California recommends remanding a partial denial of Social Security disability benefits because the vocational expert’s testimony failed to adequately resolve an apparent conflict between the claimant’s limitation to simple, repetitive tasks and the Dictionary of Occu

Uncategorized

Cerro Huerta v. Bondi — E.D. Cal. Recommends Granting Habeas Petition for 20-Year Resident Detained Under Mandatory-Detention Statute

A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of California recommends granting in part a habeas corpus petition for a Mexican national detained at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center, holding that someone who has lived in the United States for over 20 years and was apprehended in the interior is not

Uncategorized

C.Y. v. Sutter Medical Group — E.D. Cal. Dismisses Hospital’s FTCA Crossclaim Against United States Under Derivative Jurisdiction Doctrine

Eastern District of California dismisses Sutter Davis Hospital’s crossclaim for indemnity and contribution against the United States, holding that the century-old derivative jurisdiction doctrine bars federal jurisdiction over a state-court crossclaim that the federal government later removed.

Uncategorized

Hernandez v. Allison — E.D. Cal. Recommends Denying Habeas Petition Challenging California Criminal Threats Conviction and Lesser-Included Instruction

Eastern District of California recommends denying a habeas corpus petition by a state prisoner serving 25 years to life, holding that the absence of clearly established Supreme Court law requiring a jury instruction on attempted criminal threats in a non-capital case forecloses federal habeas relief

Scroll to Top