Case Hod Hasharon Municipality et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Court Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the […]
The Alaska Court of Appeals held that first-degree voter misconduct based on a false sworn statement requires proof that the defendant deliberately acted with a consciousness of wrongdoing, and it reversed the denial of Tupe Smith’s motion to dismiss her indictment.
The Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a consent search but held that five of seven convictions impermissibly punished the same criminal transaction, requiring resentencing on the two surviving counts.
Case Rajnesh Rohit Dass v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Court Federal Court of Australia (Australia) Date Decided 4 September
Case Sergio Grillone v B Riley Farber Inc. Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided September 4, 2026 Citation 2026 FC
Case Simon Pedneault v Attorney General of Canada Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided September 4, 2026 Citation 2026 FC
Case Marie Louise Foukeng v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Court Federal Court (Canada) Date Decided September 4, 2026 Citation
Case R (on the application of Moon Fish Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court High Court
Case Cynthia Njoku v Nursing and Midwifery Council Court High Court (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) Judge Hugo Keith (Lady Chief
Case State of Kansas v. Troy Michal Chambers Court Kansas Court of Appeals Judge Malone, P.J.; Hurst, J.; Coble, J.
Case Eric J. Flannery and Drane Flannery Restaurant, LLC, trading as Big Board v. Mark Eckenwiler, in his personal capacity,
Case Priscilla Sterling, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Raine Becker, individually and on behalf of all
Case EUE20 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Court Federal Court of Australia (Australia) Judge Sarah Jane Abraham (appointment info
Case R (J’s Supermarket Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Prestige Social Care Services Ltd) v
Case Arfan Munir Rai v Secretary of State for Education Court High Court (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) Judge Sir Tim
The Ninth Circuit required an opportunity to cure standing and vacated anti-SLAPP relief because defendants cannot prevail while a federal complaint may still be saved by amendment.
The Southern District ordered restoration of humanitarian parole in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District ordered immediate release to prior conditions in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District denied habeas relief without prejudice in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District ordered release after noncompliant bond process in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District required a prompt constitutionally adequate bond hearing in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District required bond hearing and barred pre-hearing transfer in a habeas challenge to immigration detention.
The Southern District dismissed a Fourth Amendment damages claim against a Border Patrol agent because extending Bivens to that context was unavailable.
The Southern District dismissed a Fourth Amendment damages claim against a Border Patrol agent because extending Bivens to that context was unavailable.