Amy Arnette v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration — Court awards $7,200 in EAJA fees and $405 in costs

Case
Amy Arnette v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration
Court
U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Judge
Cynthia Valenzuela
Date decided
2026-10-13
Docket No.
5:25-cv-02024
Topics
Equal Access to Justice Act, attorney fees, costs, joint motion, fee assignment, Treasury Offset Program, Social Security
Source
Mirrored from lexcalifornia.com

Disposition notice

On October 13, 2026, Judge Cynthia Valenzuela of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted the joint motion for settlement of attorney fees in Amy Arnette's case against the Commissioner of Social Security and the Social Security Administration. The order awards $7,200 in fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and $405 in costs, subject to the joint motion's terms. The fees are payable to Arnette, but if the Treasury Department determines that she does not owe a federal debt, the government must pay the fees directly to Prato Reichman, APC under her assignment; any payment must be delivered to her counsel's law firm. Citing Astrue v. Ratliff, the order explains that honoring the assignment depends on whether the fees are subject to an offset. The two-page order does not decide the underlying Social Security claim or separately resolve any other issue.

Read the public order

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top