Dena Peterson v. Daljit Kaur, et al. — Action dismissed without prejudice after settlement

Case
Dena Peterson v. Daljit Kaur, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Judge
Fernando M. Olguin (Barack Obama, 2012)
Date decided
2026-11-03
Docket No.
8:26-cv-02481
Topics
settlement, dismissal without prejudice, reopening after settlement, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), retention of jurisdiction
Source
Mirrored from lexcalifornia.com

Disposition notice

On November 3, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Dena Peterson's action against Daljit Kaur and other defendants without costs and without prejudice after counsel advised the court that the action had settled. The order permits the action to be reopened upon good cause shown within 30 days if the settlement is not consummated. It states that the court retains full jurisdiction and that the order does not prejudice any party. Failure to reopen or seek an extension by the deadline will be deemed consent to dismissal without prejudice. The order cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).

Read the public order

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top