Guerra v. Snap — Delaware Chancery adopts magistrate’s dismissal recommendation

Case
Elias Guerra, in his capacity as Securityholder Representative, and Popwallet, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
Court
Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge
Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick (John Carney, 2018)
Date Decided
September 28, 2026
Docket No.
2024-1009-CDW (KSJM)
Topics
motion to dismiss; magistrate’s report; exceptions; Delaware Chancery
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Elias Guerra, acting as Securityholder Representative, and Popwallet, Inc. sued Snap Inc. in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

Magistrate Wright issued a May 1, 2026 report granting Snap’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs filed exceptions to that report.

The Court’s Holding

Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick reviewed the magistrate’s report de novo, as required when exceptions are taken to a magistrate’s report.

The Chancellor found no fault with the magistrate’s conclusions, overruled the plaintiffs’ exceptions, and adopted the report in full as an order of the court. The result was dismissal pursuant to the magistrate’s recommendation.

Key Takeaways

  • The Court of Chancery conducts de novo review of exceptions to a magistrate’s report.
  • The plaintiffs’ exceptions were overruled.
  • The magistrate’s report granting Snap’s motion to dismiss became an order of the court.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the magistrate’s dismissal ruling intact and illustrates that exceptions will not succeed where de novo review reveals no error in the magistrate’s analysis.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top