Federal Case Summaries
Clear all
Coverage since November 3, 1994

Federal

Uncategorized

Seachange International v. C-COR Inc. — Prosecution Disclaimer Applies to All Claims Grouped Together in Prosecution, Even If Argument Was Made Only for One Claim

The Federal Circuit reversed an infringement judgment in a video-on-demand patent case, holding that the applicant’s prosecution argument distinguishing the prior art based on ‘point-to-point’ network interconnections created a prosecution disclaimer that limited all claims grouped

Uncategorized

Playtex Products v. Procter & Gamble — “Substantially” Flattened Surfaces Is a Term of Approximation, Not an Absolute Requirement of Flatness

The Federal Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement, holding that the term “substantially flattened surfaces” in a tampon applicator patent means surfaces materially flatter than the cylindrical barrel — not surfaces that are flat within a manufacturing tolerance

Uncategorized

Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA — Fosamax Once-Weekly Patent Obvious in Light of Prior Art Disclosing Same Dosing Concept; ‘About’ Carries Ordinary Meaning of ‘Approximately’

The Federal Circuit reversed the district court and invalidated Merck’s Fosamax once-weekly dosing patent as obvious, holding that prior art newsletter articles clearly disclosed once-weekly alendronate dosing, that the claim term ‘about’ retains its ordinary meaning of ‘appr

Uncategorized

Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Pfizer — Orange Book Patent Listing Alone Does Not Create Reasonable Apprehension of Suit for ANDA Declaratory Judgment

The Federal Circuit held that a patentee’s listing of a patent in the FDA Orange Book does not, by itself, create the reasonable apprehension of suit necessary for a generic drug maker to maintain a Hatch-Waxman declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity or non-infring

Uncategorized

Chamberlain Group v. Skylink Technologies — DMCA Anticircumvention Provision Does Not Create New Property Right or Prevent Authorized Consumer Access

The Federal Circuit held that the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provision does not create a new property right and requires proof that access was unauthorized; because Chamberlain implicitly authorized customers to use third-party transmitters, Skylink’s universal garage door opener did not

Scroll to Top