Aman v. Di Lillo — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written opinion

Case
Laura Aman v. Christopher Di Lillo, as Trustee of the Ufficio Immobiliare Declaration of Trust
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3080
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Laura Aman appealed from a decision of the County Court for Florida’s Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. County Judge Danielle A. Sherriff presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502024CC018163XXXAMB.

Aman represented herself on appeal. Christopher Di Lillo, appearing as trustee of the Ufficio Immobiliare Declaration of Trust, was represented by Daniel Adam Miller. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the issues Aman raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. Chief Judge Kuntz and Judges Shepherd and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no written legal analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, appellate arguments, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but supplies no precedential reasoning or guidance about the underlying dispute. Attorneys therefore cannot draw a substantive rule of law from the opinion itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top