Bak — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Itzhak Bak v. Joyce Bak
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Conner (Rick Scott, 2011); KLINGENSMITH (Rick Scott, 2013)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2287
Topics
Civil Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Itzhak Bak appealed an order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Jaimie Randall Goodman presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 502024CA003630XXXAMB.

The appellate court’s one-word disposition does not identify the underlying dispute, the order challenged on appeal, the arguments raised by the parties, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no written reasoning and announced no legal rule. Judges CONNER and KLINGENSMITH and Associate Judge SCHWAB, CHARLES, ANTHONY concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, issues, or legal analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s ruling in place but provides no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. The opinion stated that it would not become final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top