Baker v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
David Antonio Baker v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Lambert; Eisnaugle
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3178
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David Antonio Baker appealed from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, where Circuit Judge A. Christian Miller presided. The Fifth District’s opinion does not identify the specific ruling under review or describe the underlying facts, charges, arguments, or procedural history.

Baker was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s unspecified ruling in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the parties’ arguments. Judges Makar, Lambert, and Eisnaugle concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review.
  • The per curiam opinion contains no factual or legal analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the particular circuit-court ruling that was affirmed.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Baker’s appeal at the Fifth District without a written explanation of the court’s reasoning. Because the opinion states only “AFFIRMED,” it offers no substantive guidance about the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top