Burricks — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Kenroy Burricks v. Tamara Tomlinson-Burricks
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1167
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenroy Burricks appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Lauren M. Alperstein presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062022DR013323AXXXCE.

Burricks represented himself on appeal. Tamara Tomlinson-Burricks was represented by Louis C. Senat of McDonald Senat Law, PLLC. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no legal analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges May, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without discussing the facts, issues, or governing law.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion resolves this appeal but supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top