Hunt v. State — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Joshua David Hunt v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ciklin; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3004
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joshua David Hunt appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Sherri L. Collins presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502024CF009699AXXXMB.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charge, the facts, Hunt’s arguments, or the procedural rulings challenged on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Ciklin, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact but supplies no substantive analysis of the legal or factual issues presented. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no issue-specific guidance beyond the result in Hunt’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top