Dan Russell — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Dan Russell, LLC and Dana Russell Martin v. Jeffrey Jones and Kris Jones
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
KLINGENSMITH (Rick Scott, 2013); SHEPHERD (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1460
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dan Russell, LLC and Dana Russell Martin appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Carolyn Ruth Bell presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502023CA011128XXXXMB.

The appellate court’s decision does not describe the parties’ dispute, the claims asserted, the trial court’s reasoning, or the issues raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Klingensmith, Shepherd, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in place.
  • The Fourth District affirmed without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

Because the court issued only a per curiam affirmance, the decision resolves this appeal but supplies no explanation of the governing facts or law. The opinion therefore offers no articulated legal rule for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top