Background
Dominique Davis appealed an order of the Circuit Court for Orange County in a case against Hulu, LLC. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, which governs appeals from specified nonfinal orders.
The circuit court proceeding was assigned to Judge Michael Deen. Davis appeared pro se on appeal, while Hulu was represented by counsel.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Pratt concurred in the per curiam disposition.
The opinion consists only of the word “AFFIRMED” and provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation of the grounds for the decision. The opinion therefore does not establish which arguments were presented or why the circuit court’s ruling was upheld.
Key Takeaways
- The Sixth District affirmed the appealed circuit court ruling.
- The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
- The opinion does not disclose the underlying dispute, the issues raised, or the appellate court’s reasoning.
Why It Matters
The decision ends this stage of the appeal by leaving the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying claims or the legal standards applied.