Gross v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Daniel Gross v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); BROWNLEE, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); GANNAM, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2516
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Disposition; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Daniel Gross appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Lee County, where Judge Robert Branning presided. The underlying circuit-court case number was 02-CF-002575-B.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe Gross’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s order.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Brownlee and Gannam concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s order.
  • The decision was issued per curiam and contains no substantive analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues raised or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on the merits of similar claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top