Hernandez v. Neris — Fourth DCA affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Karla M. Hernandez v. Wilson M. Neris
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Klingen­smith; Shepherd; Lott
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1371
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Karla M. Hernandez appealed from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, where Judge Karen M. Miller presided over the underlying case.

The Fourth District’s abbreviated opinion does not identify the dispute, the order under review, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Klingen­smith, Shepherd, and Lott concurred, and the opinion stated that it would not become final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued no written explanation for its ruling.
  • The abbreviated opinion does not disclose the underlying claims or appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact but supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited primarily to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top