Ison — Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review without explanation

Case
Malorie Ison v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAKAR (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
August 4, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-3112
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Malorie Ison appealed from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, where Circuit Judge R. Lee Smith presided. The opinion does not identify the ruling under review, the underlying charges, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The State of Florida appeared as appellee. The Fifth District issued a per curiam decision, with Judges MAKAR, LAMBERT, and BOATRIGHT concurring.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review.

The court provided no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for its decision. The opinion therefore does not identify the grounds for affirmance or resolve any stated legal question.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not specify what ruling Ison challenged.
  • The decision identifies no facts, appellate arguments, or legal standard.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal at the Fifth District unless altered through a timely authorized post-decision motion. Because the court supplied only an affirmance, the opinion itself offers no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top