Whisby — Fifth DCA affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Kelly Lamont Whisby v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WALLIS (Rick Scott, 2013); Boatwright (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 4, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3771
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kelly Lamont Whisby, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The appeal arose from lower-tribunal case number 2009-CF-007169-A.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision does not describe the underlying charges, the order under review, Whisby’s arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam ruling.

The court issued no written analysis and identified no legal or factual basis for the affirmance. Judges Wallis, Boatwright, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was per curiam and contained no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the issues raised on appeal or the nature of the underlying ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but provides no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top