Lorincz v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Susan Louise Lorincz v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Harris; MacIver
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-3437
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Susan Louise Lorincz appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County, where Judge Robert W. Hodges presided. The lower-court case number was 2023-CF-002236-A.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the charges, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning or discussion of the legal issues presented.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains intact.
  • The appellate court did not identify or analyze any issue raised by Lorincz.
  • The opinion supplies no factual or legal rationale beyond the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Lorincz’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top