Mincey v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Aaron Mincey, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wallis; Lambert; Harris
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1711
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Aaron Mincey, Jr. appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-009975-A. Circuit Judge Lindsay L. Tygart presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, procedural history, facts, arguments, or issues raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Wallis, Lambert, and Harris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The judgment against Mincey was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no written analysis of the issues presented.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment in place but offers no explanation of the appellate court’s reasoning.

Because the opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it provides no articulated rule for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top