Molina — Second District summarily affirmed the circuit court

Case
Rolando Philip Molina v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Kelly, J.; LaRose, J.
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2478
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Rolando Philip Molina appealed an order of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, entered by Judge Barbara Twine-Thomas. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain summary postconviction appeals.

The Second District’s brief opinion does not identify the underlying claims, describe the circuit court’s ruling, or summarize the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s order.

The court issued no written analysis or explanation for its decision. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Kelly and LaRose concurred in the per curiam disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s order remains in effect.
  • The appeal was resolved by a per curiam affirmance without a written rationale.
  • The opinion establishes no express legal rule beyond the result in Molina’s case.

Why It Matters

Because the court provided no reasoning or discussion of the underlying claims, the decision offers little guidance for other litigants beyond confirming that Molina did not obtain relief on appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top