Mumma v. Principal Partners Group — Second District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Joseph Mumma v. Principal Partners Group, LLC
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaRose; Morris; Labrit
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2523
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joseph Mumma appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Pasco County, where Judge Susan G. Barthle presided, in litigation against Principal Partners Group, LLC.

The Second District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or additional explanation for its disposition. Judges LaRose, Morris, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion contains no analysis, it does not explain how the Second District evaluated the dispute or establish a stated rule for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top