Nasiff v. Sahn — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Sean Nasiff v. Trevo Sahn, et al.
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3187
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sean Nasiff appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Gerard Joseph Curley Jr. presided over the lower-court matter, docketed as No. 502024CA001531XXXAMB.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Gross, Levine, and Forst concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis of the legal or factual issues. Accordingly, the opinion offers no articulated rule or reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top