Wensel v. Lathrop — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
William E. Wensel, Jr. v. Victoria M. Lathrop
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
SHEPHERD (Ron DeSantis, 2025); LOTT (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3519
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

William E. Wensel, Jr. appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Richard Levenson presided over the lower-court proceeding, docketed as case number 062023CA014312AXXXCE.

The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the claims or defenses presented below, the ruling under review, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Shepherd and Lott and Associate Judge Howard K. Coates Jr. concurred in the disposition. The opinion stated that it would not become final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the lower court’s decision.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule of law and identifies no specific basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning or identify the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top