Ugalde v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jesse Ugalde v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Mize; Pratt
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2484
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jesse Ugalde appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 2019-CF-019369. Circuit Judge Robert Branning presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the criminal charges, the proceedings in the circuit court, the issues Ugalde raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Stargel, Mize, and Pratt concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court supplied no reasoning or discussion of the governing law. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged decision was affirmed and does not disclose the basis for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Lee County circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues, underlying charges, or rationale for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but provides no written legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore primarily to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top