State v. David — Denied supervisory writ after finding no defect in guilty plea or capacity concern

Case
State of Louisiana v. Mark Todd David
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
McClendon, C.J.; Hester, J.; Miller, J.
Date Decided
August 24, 2026
Docket No.
2026 KW 0809
Topics
Guilty Plea; Competency; Supervisory Writ
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mark Todd David applied for supervisory writs arising from criminal proceedings in Louisiana’s 18th Judicial District Court in Iberville Parish.

David had pleaded guilty under a negotiated plea agreement. The First Circuit reviewed the record in addressing his writ application.

The Court’s Holding

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit denied the supervisory writ. Citing Boykin v. Alabama, the court found no unconstitutional infirmity or irregularity in David’s guilty plea.

The court also found that the record did not reflect a bona fide question about David’s capacity to enter the guilty plea.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Circuit reviewed the record and denied David’s supervisory writ.
  • The court found no unconstitutional infirmity or irregularity in the negotiated guilty plea.
  • The record did not show a bona fide question concerning David’s capacity to plead guilty.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves David’s negotiated guilty plea undisturbed. Its reasoning is limited to the record before the court, which disclosed neither a constitutional or procedural defect in the plea nor a bona fide capacity question.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top