State v. Howard — Reverses early probation discharge for sex offender
Case State of New Mexico v. Patrick Howard Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Shammara H. Henderson; Megan P.
Case State of New Mexico v. Patrick Howard Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Shammara H. Henderson; Megan P.
Case John Doe 13 v. Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Inc. Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge J.
Case State of New Mexico v. Stephen Pyszkowski Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Jane B. Yohalem, Judge Date
Case State of New Mexico v. Brendon Jones Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Jane B. Yohalem; Megan P.
Case Janet M. Di Luzio, surviving spouse of Frank Di Luzio, Deceased v. City of Santa Fe Court New Mexico
Case State of New Mexico v. Christopher Dieter Gerzymisch Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Kristopher N. Houghton; Jacqueline
Case Labor Relations Board of the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions v. eVOLV Strong, LLC Court New Mexico Court
Case State of New Mexico v. George Nayman Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Katherine A. Wray (Michelle Lujan
Case State of New Mexico v. Robert Lee Chavez Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline R. Medina (appointment
Case Ruben A. Valerio, Personal Representative of the Estate of Candido Valerio, Deceased; Cultural Energy, a New Mexico Non-Profit Corporation
Case State of New Mexico v. David Henry Bowersox a/k/a David Bowersox Court New Mexico Court of Appeals Judge Hanisee
Case Kalvin Kiehne, et al. v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish and New Mexico State Game Commission Court
The New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed convictions for battery, shooting at or from a motor vehicle with a firearm enhancement, and conspiracy to commit tampering with evidence — formalizing as published precedent that the firearm enhancement under NMSA 1978, § 31-18-16 does not violate double jeopardy when applied to a shooting-at-vehicle conviction, and holding for the first time in a published opinion that identifying bullet-impact marks in photographs constitutes lay, not expert, testimony.