Fletcher v. State — affirmed an assault conviction after finding no nonfrivolous appellate issue

Case
Shanita Marie Fletcher v. the State of Texas
Court
Texas Seventh Court of Appeals
Judge
Doss; Yarbrough; Pratt
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
07-25-00357-CR
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Assault on a Public Servant, Anders Brief
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Shanita Marie Fletcher was charged with assaulting Tarrant County detention officer Alexandra Miranda. Miranda testified that Fletcher refused an order to close her cell door, approached Miranda while cursing, and continued advancing after Miranda warned that she would use O.C. spray. After Miranda sprayed her, Fletcher struck Miranda with her fists and caused her to bleed.

Fletcher pleaded not guilty and testified at the bench trial. She admitted striking Miranda after being sprayed but said she did not remember who struck first. The trial court found Fletcher guilty and sentenced her to two years’ imprisonment. Her appointed appellate counsel later moved to withdraw and filed an Anders brief concluding that the appeal presented no arguable grounds for reversal. Fletcher did not file a pro se response despite receiving an extension, and the State did not file a brief.

The Court’s Holding

The Seventh Court of Appeals independently reviewed the entire record and agreed with appointed counsel that Fletcher’s appeal was wholly frivolous and without merit. The court found no plausible basis for reversing the conviction after examining jurisdiction, evidentiary sufficiency, the proceedings and adverse rulings, Fletcher’s evidentiary objections, and sentencing.

The court affirmed the trial court’s judgment and granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw. It did not identify or decide any arguable claim of reversible error.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellate court receiving an Anders brief must independently examine the entire record for any nonfrivolous issue.
  • The court found no plausible basis to reverse Fletcher’s conviction or two-year sentence.
  • The judgment was affirmed, and appointed appellate counsel was permitted to withdraw.

Why It Matters

The opinion illustrates the review required when appointed counsel concludes that a criminal appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s assessment alone does not end the appeal; the appellate court must conduct its own examination of the record before affirming and allowing counsel to withdraw.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top