Wolfe v Taka Mayfair — Dismissed appeal because no request to be accompanied was made
Case Leonardo Wolfe v Taka Mayfair Limited Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 22 July 2026 Citation [2026] […]
Case Leonardo Wolfe v Taka Mayfair Limited Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 22 July 2026 Citation [2026] […]
Case Washington Waithaka v Barclays Execution Services Limited Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 17 July 2026 Citation
Case E Saleh v Singletrack Systems Ltd Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 16 July 2026 Citation [2026]
Case London North Eastern Railway Limited and Hitachi Rail Limited v Nimu Jiwanji and Others (and Caroline Coulson and Paul
Case M Shah v Home Office Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 13 July 2026 Citation [2026] EAT
Case Chunxiu Zhao v Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Limited Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 10 July 2026
Case Day v Health Education England and Hill Dickinson LLP Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 2 July
Case M Young v Royal Mail Group Limited Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Date Decided 29 June 2026 Citation
Case Mr G Laffy v WKCIC Group T/A Capital City College Group & Ms Odu Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United
Case Mrs S Stephens v The Health and Safety Executive Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Judge Andrew Burns KC
Case XX v YY Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Judge James Tayler (The Right Honourable The Lord Burnett of
Case Nicola Griffiths v Essex County Council Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Judge James Tayler (The Right Honourable The
Case Costco Wholesale UK Limited v Mr Jaiden Nash Court Employment Appeal Tribunal (United Kingdom) Judge James Tayler (The Right
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed an employer’s appeal, holding that the Employment Tribunal had erred in law by incorporating new complaints from a supplementary “Particulars of Claim” document into the list of issues without treating the exercise as an amendment application and applying the Selkent balance of injustice and hardship test.