Clear all
Coverage since January 5, 2026

Administrative Law

Uncategorized

Karen J. H. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Affirms Social Security Denial Where ALJ Reasonably Interpreted Doctor’s ‘Simple Work’ Limitation as Compatible With Routine Reasoning Levels

Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott affirmed a Social Security denial, holding the ALJ reasonably interpreted Dr. Abrahimi’s ‘simple work’ opinion as compatible with Level Two reasoning jobs given the plaintiff’s daily activities and part-time work as a hair stylist (a Level Four

Uncategorized

Shawn Michael H. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security Denial Where Vocational Expert Failed to Resolve DOT Conflict on Walking and Standing

Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott reversed a Social Security denial because the vocational expert failed to explain how the claimant — who could not walk or stand for six hours — could perform the ‘light work’ alternative jobs identified, where the DOT’s definition of light work pote

Uncategorized

Mitch C. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security SSI Denial for Failure to Provide Clear and Convincing Reasons to Discount Schizoaffective Symptom Testimony

Magistrate Judge Maria Audero reversed an SSI denial for a claimant with schizoaffective disorder and depression, holding the ALJ failed to provide specific, clear, and convincing reasons to discount his subjective symptom testimony — and warned that ALJs cannot rely on isolated periods of improveme

Uncategorized

Maria T. L. v. Bisignano — C.D. Cal. Reverses Social Security Disability Denial for Failure to Give Clear and Convincing Reasons to Discount Symptom Testimony

Magistrate Judge Autumn Spaeth reversed a Social Security disability denial because the ALJ summarized medical evidence without identifying which testimony she found not credible or explaining what evidence contradicted that testimony, failing the clear-and-convincing standard required by Brown-Hunt

Scroll to Top