Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since May 26, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Business Regulation

Appellate Division, First Department
Uncategorized

Edward Roberts, LLC v. Shipman & Goodwin LLP — Law Firm Cannot Limit Malpractice Damages by Blaming Client’s Own Misrepresentations

The First Department reverses a trial court’s limitation of legal malpractice damages, holding that whether a client’s misrepresentations to Walmart constituted an intervening superseding cause raises a triable issue of fact — and that $40 million in EPA-embargoed inventory losses are not capped by the client’s separate fraud.

Uncategorized

POM of Pennsylvania v. Department of Revenue — Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Skill Game Devices Are Slot Machines Requiring Gaming Act Licensing

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the Commonwealth Court and held that “skill game” devices—electronic gaming terminals marketed as legal skill-based alternatives to slot machines—are “slot machines” under the Gaming Act and prohibited “gambling devices” under the Crimes Code, with a 120-day stay giving operators time to adjust before enforcement resumes.

Scroll to Top