Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since May 26, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Criminal Law

Nevada Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Allen v. State — Alternative-Suspect Defense Requires Access to Juvenile Records Showing Similar Prior Assault

The Nevada Supreme Court reversed Allen’s convictions for sexual assault on a minor, holding en banc that a district court abused its discretion in finding A.S.’s juvenile records of a nearly identical prior sexual offense irrelevant to Allen’s alternative-suspect defense. The court found the error was not harmless where it foreclosed pretrial investigation, terminated the admissibility inquiry, the jury independently indicated interest in the alternative suspect, and the State exploited the exclusion to elicit misleading testimony.

Massachusetts Appeals Court
Uncategorized

Commonwealth v. Albert — Private Diary Entry Cannot Serve as First Complaint Evidence; Rape-of-a-Child Convictions Vacated

The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated Robert Albert’s rape-of-a-child convictions and remanded for a new trial, holding that his daughter’s private diary entry — written the day after the last alleged assault but never shared with anyone — could not qualify as “first complaint evidence” under Commonwealth v. King because the first complaint doctrine requires a communication to another person; the entry was more detailed than the actual oral disclosure, deprived the defendant of a witness to cross-examine, and was accompanied by a limiting instruction that misdescribed the diary as a “telling” of the assault.

Indiana Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Ramos-Osario v. State — State Need Not Re-Prove Constitutional Compliance at Trial After Winning Suppression Hearing

The Indiana Supreme Court held that when the State proves the constitutionality of a search or seizure at a pretrial suppression hearing, it is not required to re-establish constitutional compliance at trial; courts assessing the stop’s validity may consider evidence from both the suppression hearing and the trial, and the exclusionary rule’s aims are fully served by requiring proof once.

Uncategorized

POM of Pennsylvania v. Department of Revenue — Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Skill Game Devices Are Slot Machines Requiring Gaming Act Licensing

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the Commonwealth Court and held that “skill game” devices—electronic gaming terminals marketed as legal skill-based alternatives to slot machines—are “slot machines” under the Gaming Act and prohibited “gambling devices” under the Crimes Code, with a 120-day stay giving operators time to adjust before enforcement resumes.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Eighth District)
Uncategorized

State v. Mercado — Eighth District reverses dismissal for preindictment delay in 2002 rape case, finding no actual prejudice

The Eighth District reversed the trial court’s dismissal of a rape and kidnapping indictment for preindictment delay, holding that the defendant failed to establish actual prejudice from the 16-year gap between the offense and indictment despite the deaths of two potential witnesses.

Ohio Court of Appeals (First District)
Uncategorized

State v. Tate — First District holds consecutive firearm specifications imposed on same-transaction offenses are erroneous but not plain error

The First District held that imposing consecutive sentences on two firearm specifications was erroneous where the underlying felonies arose from the same act or transaction, but found no plain error because the defendant received an agreed sentence and failed to object below.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Fifth District)
Uncategorized

State v. Pegues — Fifth District reverses and remands for resentencing on allied offenses merger of aggravated vehicular assault and vehicular assault

The Fifth District reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that aggravated vehicular assault (OVI-based) and vehicular assault (recklessness-based) are allied offenses of similar import that must merge under R.C. 2941.25 when committed against the same victim.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Twelfth District)
Uncategorized

State v. Lane — Court refuses to merge grand theft of vehicle and attempted theft of firearm found inside

The Twelfth District held that grand theft of a motor vehicle and attempted grand theft of a firearm found in the vehicle’s glove box are not allied offenses requiring merger, because the defendant’s act of removing the gun from the car and keeping it in her bedroom reflected a separate animus.

Scroll to Top