Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since July 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

domestic-violence

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Uncategorized

Zubchevich v. Zubchevich — Grabbing Child by Neck to Place in Car Seat Constitutes ‘Intentionally Causing Bodily Injury’ Under NC Domestic Violence Statute

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed a Domestic Violence Protective Order entered against a father who grabbed his seven-year-old son by the neck and hip and carried him to his car seat, causing the child to feel dizzy, experience difficulty breathing, and turn red in the face. A 2–1 majority held that competent evidence supported the finding of “intentionally causing bodily injury” under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50B-1(a)(1) even absent a visible mark. The court also held that minor children have standing to seek DVPOs against parents through a Guardian ad litem. Judge Wood dissented, arguing that routine parental discipline without lasting injury cannot constitute domestic violence.

Wyoming Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Idler — Divorce Appeal Summarily Affirmed Where Counsel’s Briefs Lacked Cogent Argument

The Wyoming Supreme Court summarily affirmed a divorce decree granting Mother sole custody of ten children and assigning nearly all marital debt to incarcerated Father, holding that Father’s nine-issue opening brief contained no cogent argument — just general legal principles with no case-specific analysis — and that his reply brief improperly raised four new issues while failing to respond to Mother’s arguments. Attorney fees under W.R.A.P. 10.05 were declined as a matter of discretion, but costs were awarded.

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Bluffdale City v. Verive — Brief Physical Impediment of a Preferred Exit Satisfies Utah’s Unlawful Detention Statute

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed Aaron Verive’s four class B misdemeanor convictions for unlawful detention and domestic violence in the presence of a child, holding that momentarily blocking a preferred exit—whether a doorway or a vehicle—satisfies the unlawful detention statute regardless of duration or alternative routes, and that events immediately following the charged acts were intrinsic evidence outside Rule 404(b)’s other-acts exclusion.

Scroll to Top