Federal Case Summaries
Clear all
Coverage since November 3, 1994

Federal

Uncategorized

The Medicines Company v. Hospira (2016) — Federal Circuit En Banc Holds Contract Manufacturer’s Services Sale Is Not an Invalidating On-Sale Bar Event

An en banc Federal Circuit held that a pharmaceutical company’s contract with a manufacturer to produce drug batches — where title to the product remained with the inventor — did not constitute a ‘commercial sale’ triggering the on-sale bar under Section 102(b), clarifying the boun

Uncategorized

Intellectual Ventures I v. Capital One Financial — Federal Circuit Applies Alice to Financial Data Processing Patents

The Federal Circuit affirmed § 101 invalidity of Intellectual Ventures’ patents on interactive customizable web pages and database record indexing — holding that creating customizable web interfaces for financial products and organizing financial data with hierarchical index structures are abs

Uncategorized

BASCOM Global Internet Services v. AT&T Mobility — Federal Circuit Finds Inventive Concept in Non-Conventional Arrangement of Known Elements

The Federal Circuit vacated dismissal of BASCOM’s Internet content-filtering patent, holding that an inventive concept can arise from a non-conventional, non-generic arrangement of individually known elements — even if the abstract idea at the core of the claims is itself conventional.

Uncategorized

Enfish v. Microsoft — Federal Circuit Holds Self-Referential Database Patent Claims Eligible Under Alice Step 1

The Federal Circuit held that claims directed to a specific improvement in database technology — a self-referential logical table that allows all types of data to be stored in a single table structure — were directed to a concrete software improvement rather than an abstract idea, surviving Alice st

Uncategorized

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Apple Inc. (2016) — Federal Circuit Holds Doctrine of Equivalents Does Not Save Wireless Patent Claims with Different Hardware Pipelines

The Federal Circuit affirmed a jury verdict of non-infringement for Apple in a wireless patent case, holding that even mathematically equivalent signal-processing operations implemented through structurally different hardware pipelines are not equivalent under the doctrine of equivalents — the diffe

Scroll to Top